Building your wealth
The dimensions of wealth: Influencing your financial path
Building your wealth
The dimensions of wealth: Influencing your financial path
A nuanced and thoughtful approach to financial planning is like peering into a kaleidoscope. Each kaleidoscope design comprises a unique set of pieces and patterns, and those specific dimensions come together to create a one-of-a-kind mosaic. With each slight turn or shift, the pattern rearranges to reveal a new image.
This same concept applies to the decisions we make about our finances. The circumstances impacting your financial decisions are not the same as those of your friends or colleagues. Why then, do many of us take advice from friends and family, or rely on financial advice created for the masses?
Many DIY investors and robo-advisers underestimate the number of facets in a person’s life — and possible combinations of those facets — that should be considered when making financial decisions. With these models, the scope of what is considered in the financial decision-making process is limited. At times, generic advice is delivered without considering a person’s unique financial needs.
Here are the dimensions of wealth and how they influence your financial path.
While some personal dimensions are simple to identify — age, marital status, etc. — other attributes that color financial decisions are more subjective. Dimensions like personal values, long-term dreams and charitable interests tend to be more fluid and prone to evolve as one moves through life. Therefore, these need to be routinely re-examined.
Income, saving, spending, investing, debt and taxes all are interconnected; overlooking even one area can be costly.
Your sources of income — from salary, real estate, pensions or investments — affect how you structure your portfolio. As income composition changes over time, you may need to deploy different investment strategies. Unexpected life events, financial losses and legislative changes also call for a nimble and thoughtful plan.
Changing course is easier if you have advice based on all your circumstances, rather than being squeezed into a box that doesn’t quite fit.
The size of your family, ages of your children, and any age difference with your partner can play a big role in determining sufficient savings levels for things like college funding, health care costs and retirement income.
While family circumstances should be an important consideration across portfolio management and tax planning, legacy and estate settlement planning, in particular, require a more delicate and thoughtful approach in weighing sensitive situations and dynamics. A child’s special needs, health issues and/or money management skills should be reflected in your financial plan and in estate planning to provide for your loved ones.
Your prior experiences with money color your financial decisions going forward.
Awareness of behavioral factors and understanding how they may affect your decision-making can help to avoid reacting in a way that is detrimental to financial success. Some questions to ask yourself when evaluating this dimension may include:
A single factor can have an incredible impact on the outcome of a financial decision. Consider how the dimensions of wealth might impact the following common planning scenarios:
For sustainable retirement withdrawals, the standard “4% rule” says you can spend 4% of your principal balance annually during retirement without exhausting your portfolio during your lifetime. However, upon layering in the dimensions of wealth, we find that this rule doesn’t apply universally. For example:
Another common scenario that requires thoughtful consideration of the family and wealth dimensions is educational planning. For families preparing to send their children to college, starting a 529 college savings plan helps to defray tuition costs. However, when factoring in different dimensions of wealth, we see that 529 plans may not be the optimal savings vehicle for every family:
We can see that generic advice often can lead people to make misguided financial decisions. Another “rule of thumb” that falls short is the notion that one should have enough emergency funds on hand for three to six months. However, this amount of cash may be insufficient to sustain many individuals with a particular set of attributes:
In layering specific dimensions to the above scenarios, we see that a standard rule rarely applies. Conventional wisdom practiced by many robo-advisers and DIY investors often fails to realize the nuances that may call for a more restrained or aggressive approach to financial planning.
These various dimensions of wealth can result in an endless range of combinations. Since your dimensions of wealth are as unique as you, it’s important to ask if any of the financial advice you are following reflects the many facets that make up your financial life.
This article was written by Cpa, Dawn Doebler, Cfp, Mba and Cdfa from Kiplinger and was legally licensed through the Industry Dive publisher network. Please direct all licensing questions to legal@industrydive.com.
The contents in this article are being provided for educational and informational purposes only. The information and comments are not the views or opinions of Union Bank, its subsidiaries or affiliates.
Get in touch with The Private Bank
Build a financial partnership to last a lifetime.